Which is a criterion for necessity of arrest?

Which is a criterion for necessity of arrest?

• A. Height of suspect
• B. Obstruction of the highway
• C. Time of arrest
• D. Eligibility for bail

Answer: (B)

When considering necessity of arrest, the focus is on whether taking someone into custody without a warrant is required to prevent harm or protect the public. Obstruction of the highway creates an immediate safety risk and disrupts essential traffic flow, so removing the obstruction is a necessary and proportional response. Arresting the person helps restore safety and order when the obstruction cannot be quickly resolved by other means. Height of the suspect has no bearing on whether an arrest is necessary, as it does not relate to the risk or danger presented. Time of arrest isn’t a determinant of necessity—whether to arrest now or later depends on the immediacy of the threat. Eligibility for bail pertains to what happens after an arrest, not to whether the initial arrest was necessary.

When considering necessity of arrest, the focus is on whether taking someone into custody without a warrant is required to prevent harm or protect the public. Obstruction of the highway creates an immediate safety risk and disrupts essential traffic flow, so removing the obstruction is a necessary and proportional response. Arresting the person helps restore safety and order when the obstruction cannot be quickly resolved by other means.

Height of the suspect has no bearing on whether an arrest is necessary, as it does not relate to the risk or danger presented. Time of arrest isn’t a determinant of necessity—whether to arrest now or later depends on the immediacy of the threat. Eligibility for bail pertains to what happens after an arrest, not to whether the initial arrest was necessary.